The Wellington Blog — A diverse marketplace of ideas, where our investment professionals share and challenge each other’s views. They decide independently how to draw on those ideas to sharpen their investment decisions, unconstrained by any single “house view.”
Archived posts remain available on this page. Please consider the publish date while reading these older posts.
Citing consumer welfare and competition concerns, a rising chorus of voices is calling for more government regulation of the most dominant players in the US technology sector. As recently as late 2019, the co-founder of one household tech name even opined that government should step in and regulate the tech giants. The sector’s perceived impact on the upcoming national elections has helped fuel what some observers describe as growing “anti-big-tech” fervor.
So, what might come of it? It depends who you ask, but in my view, probably not a lot. I think federal privacy legislation will be on the roadmap if an agreement can be reached, but changes to antitrust law and/or content regulation seem…
COVID-19 impact on global supply chains
Localization. Digitization. Industrial protectionism. In the wake of COVID-19, the world is eager to form more resilient supply chains. These efforts could affect a range of industries as well as fiscal and monetary policy. In this 17-minute audiocast, Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha speaks with members of our Global Macro Team about the future of global supply chains.
The Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC)’s September statement and press conference did not deliver any big surprises. The upshot is that the US Federal Reserve (Fed) appears to be committed to maintaining its “dovish” monetary policy stance for the foreseeable future.
Look no further than the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), released in conjunction with the FOMC meeting minutes, in which the majority of participants indicated that Fed policy rates should remain around zero through 2023. This was largely expected, given the recent shift in the Fed’s inflation framework: Whereas the Fed has historically targeted an average inflation rate of 2% over time, under the new framework, the Fed could allow inflation to…
It’s been awhile since the CPI gave us something to think about, but today I believe there is an increased (and growing) probability of an inflationary outcome driven by several factors:
- The public health crisis is an exogenous shock (vs. the endogenous adjustment of a typical recession), suggesting a quicker recovery (influenced by the path/duration of the virus).
- The policy response to the crisis was swift and massive. This is the first time in decades there has been coordinated monetary and fiscal easing, and it is at a scale never seen outside of wartime.
- If Biden wins the US election, his administration will likely focus immediately on additional stimulus for the unemployed. Combined with the Fed’s “whatever it takes” approach to fighting deflation, this provides additional upside support to inflation.
Compounding the challenges faced by some institutions
The inflation/deflation outcome will have important portfolio implications for many institutional investors, including…
Earlier this summer, I virtually participated in an institutional conference with about 100 other asset managers and prominent asset owners from the US, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. It was well worth my time. Here are my main takeaways, along with some personal observations on the post-COVID-19 industry landscape.
1. Economic assumptions and forecasts were more dire than I’ve seen internally. While Chinese gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to reach pre-COVID levels this year, the US may not get there until mid-2021 and likely only on the strength of “50% of the economy in steep recovery,” according to one conference participant. The other half of the US economy may..